Posts: 10
Threads: 3
Joined: Jun 2018
Reputation:
0
I'm also interested in getting it working for my Cisco and Meraki switches and appliances.
Posts: 1,047
Threads: 42
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation:
25
Hi all,
Sorry - I'm coming into this discussion after NEMS 1.4 release (I've been too busy in development mode to be monitoring the community).
Could someone summarize for me what you need me to add?
Also, just a note that in NEMS 1.4 I compiled SNMP directly into Nagios 4.3.4 (see the changelogs) so I am wondering if this is all a moot point. Could someone confirm?
Thanks :) Looking forward to hearing your feedback.
Robbie
Robbie Ferguson // The Bald Nerd
Did I help you out? Appreciate what I do? Please consider saying thanks:
Posts: 11
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2018
Reputation:
1
Hi Guys,
Robbie's work has really paid-off with 1.4 - what a brilliant package 1.4 is! I have a question for the experts using Check_SNMP command...
Before when using NEMS 1.3.1, for example using the argument for up time below in Check_SNMP:
C public -o 1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0
I used to get the output, for example:
Timeticks: (7565300) 21:00:53.00
However, with the exact same configuration in 1.4 and check_SNMP, it returns, for example
SNMP OK - 6763300
Doing an SNMPwalk confirms the RAW output still as Timeticks and the integer, but for some reason 1.4 is only returning the integer as the result of the argument, and not the human time-tick output.
Is anyone else seeing this behavior? Any workarounds or command changes anyone know of?
Many thanks in advance.
Dave.
Posts: 1,047
Threads: 42
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation:
25
Hey Tech Dave,
Thanks for the note. I'm looking into patching NEMS 1.4+ to output SNMP responses the way you desire. Why did they change it?! Gah...
Others have already been through this, and some suggestions have been posted on the Nagios forums. I'm aggregating the various suggestions there and writing a patch. Hope to have it out to you by the weekend.
Thanks!
Robbie
Robbie Ferguson // The Bald Nerd
Did I help you out? Appreciate what I do? Please consider saying thanks: